Why Is My Child Strong in Expressive Language, Yet Weak in Receptive?
It’s more common than you might think: a child who talks nonstop, uses advanced vocabulary, and seems well beyond their age in conversation—but who constantly misunderstands directions, misses key details in class, or seems out of sync when listening to others.
This mismatch between expressive and receptive language can be confusing, especially for parents. I often hear things like, “He talks circles around adults, but it’s like he doesn’t register what I’m saying,” or “She can go on and on about her favorite topics, but she always seems lost when the conversation changes.”
One particular child I worked with stood out. He could monologue for long stretches about specific topics—space, engines, the periodic table—and used expressive language that seemed incredibly mature. But he often insisted on controlling the conversation. His parents said he would redirect or interrupt if they tried to discuss anything outside of his preferred interests. He would often become frustrated or shut down if a conversation shifted away from a familiar script.
Interestingly, his parents didn’t believe he was autistic. They saw him as quirky and highly verbal—but also emotionally intense, sometimes sensitive to sound, and occasionally rigid in his routines. When I tested him for auditory processing difficulties, it quickly became clear that he was missing a great deal of incoming language, especially when it was rapid, abstract, or layered with background noise. It wasn’t that he didn’t care what others were saying—it was that he simply couldn’t track it unless it matched something he had already internalized.
We began supporting him with tools to improve access to auditory information, including strategies to reduce noise and break down verbal input. He also began working with a school-based speech-language pathologist and occupational therapist. Over time, some of his sensory reactivity and communication rigidity started to ease. He still had strong preferences, but the constant conversational “grabbing” lessened. Eventually, he was formally diagnosed with autism—though at that point he was considered low-support and well-adapted to the school environment.
That diagnosis helped confirm what we’d already seen in his auditory testing: he wasn’t processing verbal information clearly or consistently. And while the expressive language gave the illusion of strong communication skills, the receptive foundation underneath it had been unstable.
This is very common. Autism is a sensory processing disability, and sensory challenges affect the vast majority of autistic individuals. If auditory input is unreliable—distorted, too fast, too loud, or buried in background noise—it can interfere with understanding. That breakdown can lead to frustration, behavior challenges, academic gaps, and difficulty learning core social skills like conversational turn-taking or topic switching.
When language input isn’t fully accessible, children often develop expressive workarounds—scripts, memorized phrasing, topic steering—that help them stay engaged on their own terms. But these strategies can mask how much they’re missing.
What also stood out in this case was how much his evaluations changed over time. When he was younger, he was assessed and did not meet criteria for autism. His early cognitive testing also showed relatively low scores in verbal reasoning and other language-based areas. But his parents always felt those results didn’t match the child they saw at home—engaged, curious, and full of knowledge in areas that mattered to him.
Years later, after receiving auditory support and working with professionals who gave him more meaningful access to language, he was retested. This time, he was diagnosed as autistic—though functioning well with minimal support—and his cognitive scores had changed significantly. His verbal skills, vocabulary, and comprehension were now much stronger than before.
Now, I want to be clear: I’m not a psychologist, and I don’t speak formally on IQ testing or neurocognitive diagnostics. That’s outside of my scope. But as an audiologist who works closely with children facing language and sensory barriers, this pattern doesn’t surprise me.
When children grow up with auditory deprivation—whether due to hearing loss, frequent ear infections, or auditory processing disorder—they may not fully develop the foundational language skills that support abstract thinking, working memory, or higher-order reasoning.
But when you improve access—when the sound becomes clearer, when language input starts to land—you often see the child begin to grow in these areas. Not overnight. But measurably. Meaningfully. Consistently.
Even when children only understand an incomplete pattern of language, they still manage to create communication. But it often develops in restricted areas of interest—subjects they’ve memorized, overlearned, or can control. These children may be strong in narrow content areas, but have uneven academic skills and marked difficulty with social interaction. This communication profile—verbose but rigid, high vocabulary but low flexibility—can look remarkably similar to what we see in autism.
In the case of the child I mentioned earlier, he eventually did qualify for an autism diagnosis. But I’ve also seen children who present similarly and don’t ultimately meet criteria for autism. What they share is partial or inconsistent access to language—sometimes due to hearing loss, sometimes due to auditory processing issues. They try to compensate by steering the conversation toward known territory, often with limited ability to shift topics, read social cues, or understand unfamiliar language input.
In these cases, it’s not always autism. It may simply be that the child has never had complete access to language, and so they’ve built a communication style around what they could access—one that appears rigid or self-directed, but is really a protective adaptation.
This is why receptive language must be assessed carefully—especially in kids who appear highly verbal. Speech alone isn’t the full story. Understanding, processing, and responding in real time is where we often find the real challenges.
If you’re noticing this pattern in your child—articulate, expressive, but disconnected from conversation or struggling with classroom comprehension—don’t ignore it. It doesn’t mean your child is lazy or inattentive. It may mean they need better access to sound, language, and sensory supports.
Visual Description
This cartoon-style illustration shows a young boy excitedly talking, gesturing animatedly with both hands while seated at a table. He is smiling widely and appears completely immersed in his own thoughts. Above his head is a large thought bubble filled with images that reflect his intense interests: a rocket ship, a smaller spaceship, a horse galloping, an engine, and a planet or moon—suggesting topics like space, science, and animals.
Standing beside the boy are two adults—presumably his parents—who look puzzled and slightly overwhelmed. The mother has a furrowed brow and her arms crossed, while the father stands stiffly with a blank or tired expression, both clearly unsure how to respond to their son’s intense monologue.
The tone of the image is warm but subtly humorous, illustrating a common communication disconnect where a child with narrow, passionate interests may dominate conversations, leaving parents at a loss for how to engage.
References
Paul, R., & Norbury, C. (2018). Language Disorders from Infancy Through Adolescence: Listening, Speaking, Reading, Writing, and Communicating (5th ed.). Elsevier.
Bellis, T. J. (2011). Assessment and Management of Central Auditory Processing Disorders in the Educational Setting: From Science to Practice (2nd ed.). Plural Pub.
Bishop, D. V. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 858–886.
Nittrouer, S., & Burton, L. T. (2005). The role of early language experience in shaping speech perception. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(3), 643–659.
Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Sedey, A. L., Coulter, D. K., & Mehl, A. L. (1998). Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics, 102(5), 1161–1171.
Vaidya, H., Waknis, A. P., & Deshpande, S. (2021). Pragmatic abilities of children with severe to profound hearing loss. International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 7(5), 736–745.
Ching, T. Y. C., Cupples, L., Leigh, G., Hou, S., & Wong, A. (2021). Predicting quality of life and behavior and emotion from functional auditory and pragmatic language abilities in 9-year-old deaf and hard-of-hearing children. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(22), 5357.
Tupola, K., Lopponen, H., Aarnisalo, A., Hyvärinen, A., Laitakari, J., & Kunnari, S. (2025). Factors associated with social-pragmatic understanding in deaf and hard of hearing and typically hearing 6-year-old children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 68(2), 808–826.
Murray, D., Lesser, M., & Lawson, W. (2005). Attention, monotropism and the diagnostic criteria for autism. Autism, 9(2), 139–156.
Moore, D. R., Zobay, O., & Ferguson, M. A. (2020). Minimal and mild hearing loss in children: Association with auditory perception, cognition, and communication problems. Ear and Hearing, 41(4), 720–732.
Miller, C. A., & Wagstaff, D. A. (2011). Behavioral profiles associated with auditory processing disorder and specific language impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 44(6), 745–763.
Join Our Subscription Group
Want early access to new blog posts, printable handouts, and classroom-friendly tools?
Subscribe to our email list and be the first to:
Download visuals, checklists, and APD-friendly guides
Get subscriber-only discounts on upcoming digital materials
Join a growing network of professionals and families supporting kids and adults with auditory, language, and learning challenges
To join:
Email us at info@drraestout.com or visit our website:
We never send spam, and we never share your information.
